Committee
on Online Learning (COOL)
Course Proposal Overview Prior to reading the process overview below, you
may want to:
The process below applies to all faculty, whether you are interested in
teaching a course that is already offered online or not. While the forms consist of various checklists to guide
you for each step of the process, we recommend that you first read everything
below. At the end of this page, you will be directed to the forms page. If you
have a question after reading everything below, check out the
FAQ page or contact a member of the committee.
- Research
- Faculty Skills Assessment Development
- Proposal Creation
- Internal Subdivision Review
- Submission of Proposal to the Committee on
Online Learning
-
- First and foremost, read the Guidelines for Distance Education Review
from the
Curriculum Handbook.
- Contact colleagues
on-campus with experience in DE delivery, as well as
colleagues at other campuses already
offering similar curricula in DE formats.
- Gather information on available
resources, including costs. Involve members of your subdivision,
sharing the strengths and weaknesses of possible media and delivery
approaches:
- Review reading materials for
teaching online, which not only provide structure but present fantastic
ideas for encouraging an effective online environment.
Some of the key questions you might want to focus upon include:
- Who will be taking this class? What learning skills will be required for
students to be successful?
- What are the MOST important concepts, demonstrations, discussions, and
activities that you do in this class in its current on-campus format? How
will you accomplish these via distance delivery modes? If a fully online delivery mode
might not be optimal, how can you architect a hybrid class with flexible
on-campus meetings, or create alternative assignments that will encourage
equivalent learning?
- Where is this class being offered in similar online or hybrid online modes? What can we
emulate? What additional technologies or services will be required?
-
Faculty should examine their own skills regarding technology and distance
education. If the proposed course will involve the use of new technologies, the
faculty member should define a timeline and roadmap of
training required before the course may be delivered
effectively (for example,
Blackboard training is required prior to receiving a course site).
Select from the many
training
opportunities created for instructors just like you:
-
Working with the CWS staff,
divisional colleagues and administration,
members of the Committee
on Online Learning, and
experienced online faculty, create a
proposal (obtain proposal form of specific questions and
view previously submitted proposals) that should be shared with subdivision colleagues.
Use the
following
questions as a guide to the key issues to be discussed in your justification, focusing on the students who will take the course.
(The proposal form will list the specific questions to
answer).
- How will the online course meet existing (or new) course outline
requirements?
- What combination of resources will be required for students?
- How will you assess the success of the delivery modes?
-
Review the proposal formally
with your division colleagues. Consider testing the ideas involved with an
online or hybrid online
section in "sub-sections" of current on-campus classes, offering students the
opportunity to participate with online resources, and sharing the results with
divisional colleagues concerned with issues of retention and quality. Where
possible, consider using the same assessment instruments as on-campus classes
to facilitate comparisons of student success.
- Note that formal review means more than casual consultation in the
hallway; we suggest that a meeting be called with all subdivision colleagues
invited, and a formal vote be taken about the curriculum proposal.
- If colleagues in the subdivision are not in favor of the proposal as
formulated, seek ways to explore online delivery with existing classes to gain
data and input about the viability of the approaches.
Look for other similar
sections already offered across the state and country, and gather data from
instructors in those sections. But do not allow lack of understanding and
familiarity about DE to be a roadblock to innovation. Criticism of the
approach should be based not upon, "I don't think it will work" but rather
upon specific pieces of the course content and outline that are not
addressed in the proposed format.
- Colleague may disagree about whether the proposed delivery modes will be
effective in helping our students achieve success. They may disagree about
whether the institution can support the proposed class as designed. But
disagreement about implementation does not mean that the proposal may not be
workable. Use criticism constructively; look for existing, successful
implementations at other institutions as evidence online delivery modes CAN be
offered effectively.
-
For instructors new to teaching online at Chabot College, presentation to the
Committee on Online Learning
is required. Click on
Forms to begin completing required paperwork and find out
where/who to submit them to.
|