|
.. | |||
![]() |
||||
|
Student Learning Outcomes & Assessment Cycle (SLOAC)Guidelines and Forms for Planning your CLO AssessmentsBasic Information: At Chabot, we have started our practice in assessment at the course-level, and at the institutional level in our college-wide learning goal pilots. Below you will find some useful guides and forms which support course-level assessment. The policy statement outlines our current standards for how many CLOs are needed per course, and what sampling looks like. The ideal way to look at a course is by it's course content and not units for how many outcomes are necessary, but a 3-unit course is likely to have course content which can be covered by 3-5 course-level outcomes (CLOs). If you are assessing where your discipline is at with SLOs, the following steps are suggested:
Course-level Assessment Schedule:The course-level assessment schedule allows disciplines to plan which courses are up for assessment when, and by whom. It is likely we will assessing each course every three years, to align with our curriculum, program review, and accreditation cycles. When you close the loop on an outcome, you have determined a course of action to try to better achieve learning, if you have determined a change is necessary. Allowing a semester or two to go by as you are enacting the change is helpful, to iron out any difficulties with the new approach, before you measure again. Below are examples for the schedule and the link to the form.
Determining Appropriate Assessments (Assignments): On Choosing Assessments (Assignments): This chart helps provides pros and cons of various assessment vehicles: Assessment for Higher Levels of Cognition: Our Flex day 10.26.10 brainstorming session on cognitive levels yielded good examples of assessments in various disciplines for the 6 different levels of cognition. DRAFT CLO Assessment Plans: This semester, we have developed a new draft course assessment plan, for faculty to try out. One purpose is so that disciplines may determine assessments (assignments) across their sections of comparable difficulty. The second purpose is so that disciplines can set internal standards of achievement for students. That is, what % of students need to achieve what level of success for the results to be satisfactory, and therefore, no change is needed? We welcome feedback on this form. This page was last updated 10.23.10 |
|
| Copyright © 2010 Chabot College. 25555 Hesperian Blvd. Hayward, CA. 94545 | Phone: (510) 723-6600 |